86 Hall Park Hill, Sheffield, S6 5QU

MAN/00CG/LSC/2020/0008 · service charges · Sheffield · decided 5 Aug 2020

figures not yet checked

The tribunal found the Respondent liable for £1721.28 of major works charges for fire sprinklers and £142.18 of insurance, and refused a section 20C order.

Outcome	Not stated
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)	Refused
Section 20 consultation	Not in issue
Who applied	Landlord or management company
Freeholder / landlord	Sheffield City Council
Management company	none named
Managing agent	none named
Building	One flat, 4 flats
Service charge years in dispute	not stated
Items in dispute	insurance, major works, management fees
Items disallowed or reduced	major works
Total demanded	not stated as one figure
Total found payable	not stated as one figure
Fees or costs ordered	none stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

years: Major works service charge incurred during the financial year 1.4.16 – 31.3.17 for fire sprinklers totaling £1845.63.
items reduced: The amount had been reduced by a number of credits as outlined in the Applicant's statement of case, leaving the sum of £1721.28 outstanding.
s20c: There is no reason why an order should be made under s20C.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.