Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near CT20 2PP

84 Bouverie Road West, Folkestone, Kent, CT20 2PP

CHI/29UL/LDC/2024/0059 · dispensation from consultation · Folkestone and Hythe · decided 15 Apr 2024

The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for remedial roof, gable, soffit and dampness works at the building, with dispensation conditional on the landlord giving all leaseholders a copy of the decision.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationDispensation granted
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordSimwon Property Company Limited
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingA block, 4 flats
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputerepairs and maintenance
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
comprising four self-contained flats over three floors
freeholder
Applicant : Simwon Property Company Limited
outcome
The Tribunal grants an order dispensing with the consultation requirements under S.20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
s20
The Tribunal grants an order dispensing with the consultation requirements under S.20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.