82B Etta Street, Deptford, London, SE8 5NT
LON/00AZ/LSC/2021/0128 · service charges · Lewisham · decided 27 Jun 2022
The tribunal found the fire safety works were reasonable and prudent, but removed a duplicate charge so that £411.61 of the £661.61 challenged is payable by the leaseholder.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Consultation failure found |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 2 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2020 |
| Items in dispute | other, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | other |
| Total demanded | £661.61 |
| Total found payable | £411.61 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
containing two flats
- years
The Applicant also challenged the estimated cost of repairs for 2020-2021.
- outcome
In summary the Tribunal finds that the sum of £411.61 to be payable by the Applicant.
- items reduced
This was a duplicate charge and was removed
- total demanded
The total unit cost of this work is £661.61.
- total payable
the sum of £411.61 to be payable by the Applicant
- s20
No consultation was carried out and the cost was capped at £250 per unit.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.