82 Westow Hill London SE19 1SB
LON/00AH/LDC/2020/0005 · dispensation from consultation · Croydon · decided 3 Feb 2020
The tribunal granted dispensation from the s20 consultation requirements only for the dry rot investigation and remedial work, refusing it for roof works and other remedial works and for any retrospective earlier works.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Other |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | MH Associates |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- agent
A written application was made by MH [name] Chartered [name] who have been appointed by the freeholder to supervise works to the property.
- outcome
The tribunal grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of under s20 ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- s20
The tribunal grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of under s20 ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 and the Service Charges (Consultation Requirements) (England) Regulations 2003 for the work to investigate and carry out remedial action in respect of the dry rot outbreak only.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.