82, The Hides, Harlow, Essex CM20 3QW
CAM/22UJ/LSC/2020/0003 · service charges · Harlow · decided 20 Aug 2020
The tribunal found the major works charge for this flat reasonable and payable, less agreed omissions, made a section 20C order and a paragraph 5A order, and refused to order reimbursement of the application fee.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Harlow District Council |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 10 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | major works |
| Total demanded | £10,631.85 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | no order for reimbursement of the application fee |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
77 – 86 (10 Units)
- outcome
are reasonable and payable by the Applicant to the Respondent.
- items reduced
the omission, in the Applicant’s case, of the cost of the insulation and replacement store room door as agreed by the Respondent
- total demanded
Service Charges of £10,631.85 as his contribution towards Major Works
- s20c
The Tribunal makes an Order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- costs
The Tribunal makes no order for the reimbursement of the Application Fee.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.