81 Arthur Court, Queensway, London, W2 5HP
LON/00BK/LSC/2025/0735 · service charges · Westminster · decided 24 Dec 2025
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found the service charge demands invalid for omitting the landlord's address but held the charges payable because they were reissued with the address and s.20B was satisfied, and it found the disputed charges payable and the estimated charges for 2024-25 reasonable.
| Outcome | Not stated |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Arthur Court Management Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Respondent Arthur Court Management Limited |
| Building | One flat, 93 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2023, 2024 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, cleaning and grounds, insurance, legal and professional fees, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
a 1930’s block comprising 93 flats
- freeholder
Respondent Arthur Court Management Limited
- years
Certain items of the service charge expenditure for 31st October 2023 to 24th June 2024
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.