80A, Balcombe Street, London, NW1 6NE
LON/00BK/LBC/2019/0029 · breach of lease · Westminster · decided 16 Aug 2019
The Tribunal found no breach of clause 3(xiii) or 3(xiv) of the lease for the basement flat, and made orders under section 20C and paragraph 5A that the applicant's costs of the proceedings cannot be recovered from the respondent.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Rapperwood Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 3 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2019 |
| Items in dispute | insurance, repairs and maintenance, legal and professional fees |
| Items disallowed or reduced | legal and professional fees |
| Total demanded | £9,456 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
It appears that there are three flats in the building
- freeholder
The Applicant, Rapperwood Limited (Rapperwood), holds the freehold interest
- outcome
The Tribunal finds that there is no breach of clause 3(xiii)
- s20c
The Tribunal makes an order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant 1985 Act that none of the costs incurred by the Applicant in connection with these proceedings may be recovered through the service charge
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.