80, 83, 84 & 85 Lichfield Street and 60 Sunset Close, Tamworth, B79 7QL_BIR/41UK/LIS/2021/0035
BIR/41UK/LIS/2021/0035 · LIS · Tamworth · decided 23 Mar 2022
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found the roof works to Lichfield Street and Sunset Close were not required when carried out, so the roof charges were reduced by 14.29%, while the structural works to 49 Sunset Close were found payable as invoiced, and the landlord's costs were excluded from the service charge.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Consultation failure found |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2021 |
| Items in dispute | major works, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | major works |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- years
roof repairs the costs of which formed part of service charges for 2021
- outcome
the service charge demands in respect of the roof works should be reduced by 14.29% as follows:
- items reduced
It is the Tribunal’s determination that the service charge demands in respect of the roof works should be reduced by 14.29% as follows:
- s20c
Accordingly, the Tribunal makes make an order under section 20C of the Act that none of the Applicant’s costs of these proceedings are to be regarded as relevant costs
- s20
The Applicant admitted that an element of the consultation procedure was flawed
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.