Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near CV10 0UL

8 West Wing, Caldecote Hall, Nuneaton, CV10 0UL

BIR/44UC/LSC/2024/0007 · service charges · North Warwickshire · decided 7 Mar 2025

figures not yet checked

The tribunal agreed that the landlord may collect reserve fund contributions in the proportions in which the costs will eventually be spent, and made an order preventing the landlord from adding its costs of the case to the service charge.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Order made
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLeaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlordnot a company, or not stated
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingOne flat, 24 flats
Service charge years in dispute2023, 2024
Items in disputecleaning and grounds, insurance, legal and professional fees, management fees, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
There are thus 24 flats in the Manor House.
years
for the service charge years 2023/24 and 2024/25
outcome
The Tribunal agrees with the Respondent’s approach to demands for reserve funds.
s20c
We therefore so order.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.