8 Swan Court, East Street, Andover, Hants SP10 1EZ
CHI/24UN/LSC/2022/0123 · service charges · Test Valley · decided 9 Jun 2023
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found that none of three back-dated service charge demands for 2020 to 2022 were payable, because they lacked the required statutory summary of tenants' rights and an address for service, and the on-account demands for 2020 and 2021 were served too late; a section 20C order was also made.
| Outcome | Not payable |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | DPS Company Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2020, 2021, 2022 |
| Items in dispute | insurance, administration charges |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- years
the years ending 2020, 2021 and 2022
- outcome
No sums are payable pursuant to the three demands served on 5th August 2022 on the Applicants.
- total payable
No sums are payable pursuant to the three demands
- s20c
I make an order under s.20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 prohibiting the Respondent
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.