8 Richards House & other properties WS2 8NN
BIR/00CU/LDC/2020/0001 · dispensation from consultation · Walsall · decided 14 Sep 2020
The tribunal granted the landlord Watmos Community Homes Limited dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for the external wall insulation and related major works, conditional on a cap of £13,000 per flat including the costs of the application.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Watmos Community Homes Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | An estate, 6 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
comprising a total of 1,731 flats
- freeholder
Applicant : Watmos Community Homes Limited
- outcome
The Tribunal grants dispensation from all or any of the consultation requirements of Section 20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- s20
The Tribunal grants dispensation from all or any of the consultation requirements of Section 20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.