8 Redcliffe Street, London SW10 9DS
LON/00AW/LDC/2022/0176 · dispensation from consultation · Kensington and Chelsea · decided 28 Nov 2022
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent repairs to the downpipe, hopper and flat roof causing rainwater ingress, with no objections received from leaseholders.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | 8 Redcliffe Street Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 4 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The building is a townhouse consisting of 4 flats over 4 levels
- freeholder
Applicant : 8 Redcliffe Street Ltd
- outcome
The Tribunal grants the Applicant dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements in respect of works required to the downpipe, hopper and flat roof
- s20
The Tribunal grants the Applicant dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements in respect of works required to the downpipe, hopper and flat roof
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.