Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near SW16 1SX

8 Marchmont House, Faylands Estate, Streatham, London SW16 1SX

LON/00AG/LSC/2025/0823 · service charges · Wandsworth · decided 5 Nov 2025

figures not yet checked

The tribunal found that the section 20 Initial Notice for the roof major works was on balance sent to the leaseholder, so the consultation was valid and the £8052 is payable, and no section 20C order was made.

OutcomePayable as demanded
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Refused
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLeaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlordnot a company, or not stated
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingOne flat
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputemajor works
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demanded£8,052
Total found payable£8,052
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

outcome
so in the absence of further challenge the sum of £8052 is payable in respect of the Works
total demanded
Major Works which had a liability of £8052 for the subject property
total payable
the sum of £8052 is payable in respect of the Works
s20c
no order is made, following the assurances from the Respondent that the leases do not provide a mechanism to recover these costs

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.