8, 12, 12A, 14 & Flat 2, 16, Rollscourt Avenue, London, SE24 0EA

LON/00AY/LDC/2024/0060 · dispensation from consultation · Lambeth · decided 18 Jun 2024

The tribunal refused the council's application for dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for road and car park resurfacing works that started before consultation was completed, because the leaseholders would be prejudiced by the failure to consult and an administrative error was no excuse.

Outcome	Other decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)	Not applied for
Section 20 consultation	Dispensation refused
Who applied	Landlord or management company
Freeholder / landlord	not a company, or not stated
Management company	none named
Managing agent	none named
Building	A block, 11 flats
Service charge years in dispute	not stated
Items in dispute	repairs and maintenance
Items disallowed or reduced	none stated
Total demanded	not stated as one figure
Total found payable	not stated as one figure
Fees or costs ordered	none stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n: consisting of 11 mixed tenure flats of which 5 are leasehold
outcome: The tribunal does not exercise its discretion to grant dispensation from the consultation requirements of s20ZA in respect of the works
s20: The tribunal therefore refuses dispensation..

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.