79 Sutherland Avenue, London W9 2HG
LON/00BK/LDC/2020/0084 · dispensation from consultation · Westminster · decided 28 Sep 2020
The tribunal granted the freeholder company dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent external structural works completed in February 2020, costing £39,377.97 including VAT, leaving leaseholders free to challenge the reasonableness of the cost.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 5 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £39,377.97 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The subject property comprises a property that has been converted into 5 flats.
- outcome
The tribunal determines that dispensation is granted to the applicant pursuant to section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- total demanded
in the sum of £39,377.97 (inclusive of VAT)
- s20
The tribunal determines that dispensation is granted to the applicant pursuant to section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in respect of the works only
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.