Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near SW11 4BJ

78B Prince of Wales Mansions, Prince of Wales Drive, Battersea, London SW11 4BJ

LON/00BJ/LAC/2019/0027 · administration charges · Wandsworth · decided 10 Feb 2020

figures not yet checked

The tribunal found that the £2,000 administration charge for retrospective consent to an alteration was unreasonable and set the payable amount at £1,250.

OutcomeReduced
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLeaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlordMagnacircle Ltd
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingOne flat
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputeadministration charges
Items disallowed or reducedadministration charges
Total demanded£2,000
Total found payable£1,250
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

outcome
the charge of £2,000 is not reasonable and that a reasonable charge would have been no more than £1,250
items reduced
the charge of £2,000 is not reasonable and that a reasonable charge would have been no more than £1,250
total demanded
the Respondent charged £2,000 for the retrospective grant of consent
total payable
The Applicant shall pay to the Respondent the sum of £1,250

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.