78 The Ridings Luton Bedfordshire LU3 1BY
CAM/00KA/LIS/2019/0023 · LIS · Luton · decided 11 Dec 2019
The tribunal held that the service charge percentage of 2.27% was payable under clause 8(d) of the lease, refusing the applicant's challenge to the rate, and made an order under paragraph 5A of Schedule 11 preventing the landlord recovering litigation costs as an administration charge.
| Outcome | Dismissed or struck out |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Homehurst Limited |
| Management company | Meridian Retirement Housing Services Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2010, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 |
| Items in dispute | reserve fund, administration charges |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
made between Homehurst Limited of the first part
- management company
Meridian Retirement Housing Services Limited of the second part
- years
being 2010-2011, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16 2016-17 and 2017-18
- outcome
the Tribunal is satisfied that the applicant has been correctly reasonably and justifiably charged at the rate of 2.27% and so the application is refused.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.