77 Onslow Gardens, Kensington, London, SW7 3QD
LON/00AG/LDC/2024/0189 · dispensation from consultation · Kensington and Chelsea · decided 28 Oct 2024
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent pest control treatments for rats at the building, because the treatments were needed to address a health and safety risk.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | The Wellcome Trust Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Ringley Limited |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £2,706 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
a building comprising six self-contained residential flats
- freeholder
Applicant : The Wellcome Trust Limited
- agent
The Property is managed by Ringley Limited
- outcome
The Tribunal grants unconditional dispensation pursuant to section 20ZA
- total demanded
These works cost £2,706.00 including VAT
- s20
The Tribunal grants dispensation pursuant to section 20ZA in respect of the series of pest control treatments
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.