76 Hermitage Court, Woodford Road, London, E18 2EP
LON/00BC/LSC/2024/0278 · service charges · Redbridge · decided 29 Oct 2024
The Tribunal found the £557 waste disposal charge for skip hire and labour reasonable and therefore payable, rejecting the leaseholder's claim that it was excessive, and made no order under section 20C.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Hermitage Court E18 Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Barley Chambers Property Management Services Limited |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £557 |
| Total found payable | £577 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Respondent : [name] Court E18 Limited
- agent
The Property is managed by Barley Chambers Property Management Services Limited.
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that the £577 claimed, representing £432.00 for skip hire including delivery and collection, and £125 for the labour costs, is a reasonable amount.
- total demanded
being £557.00 claimed in respect of waste disposal costs
- total payable
The Tribunal determines that the £577 claimed
- s20c
the Tribunal does not make an order under section 20C.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.