76 Canfield Gardens, London NW6 3ED
LON/00AG/LDC/2019/0163 · dispensation from consultation · Camden · decided 11 Nov 2019
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent asbestos removal works in the basement of 76 Canfield Gardens, but did not decide whether the costs are reasonable or payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 5 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
in respect of 5 flats at 76 Canfield Gardens
- freeholder
the landlord, 76 Canfield Gardens Limited
- outcome
Dispensation is granted pursuant to section 20ZA of the Landlord & Tenant Act 1985.
- s20
Dispensation is granted pursuant to section 20ZA of the Landlord & Tenant Act 1985.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.