75 White Hart Lane, Barnes, London SW13 0PW
LON/00BD/LAM/2025/0036 · appointment of a manager · Richmond upon Thames · decided 30 Mar 2026
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal appointed a manager for the building for four years from 31 March 2026, with the parties' agreement, after a failure to maintain and repair was alleged, and limited the respondent's ability to add its costs of this application to the service charges.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Arora Property Developments Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 4 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
there are 4 leasehold titles registered under the freehold title
- freeholder
Respondent : [name] Property Developments Limited
- outcome
the tribunal makes the Management Order attached to this decision
- s20c
the tribunal determines it is just and equitable to make an order under s.20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.