75 and 76 Eton Hall, Eton College Road, Nw3 2DH
LON/00AG/LSC/2023/0302 · service charges · Camden · decided 19 Feb 2024
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal decided that the planned maintenance charges demanded from the leaseholders for 2017 to 2023 are recoverable under the lease and are payable in the amounts claimed by the landlord, with any section 20C request left for later submissions.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Shellpoint Trustees Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Parkgate Aspen Ltd |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 |
| Items in dispute | reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Applicant : Shellpoint Trustees Ltd
- agent
a director of Parkgate Aspen Ltd, the Respondent’s managing agents
- years
from 2017 to 2023
- outcome
the amount payable in respect of the planned maintenance charge are as claimed by the Applicant
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
Later rulings on the same case (costs, section 20C, permission to appeal): 22 Apr 2024.
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.