75-89 Lancaster Gate, London, W2 3NH
LON/00BK/LDC/2020/0087 · dispensation from consultation · Westminster · decided 20 Jan 2021
The tribunal granted the freeholder dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for the additional facade repair works at 75-89 Lancaster Gate, without deciding whether the charges are reasonable or payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | The Lancasters Management Ltd |
| Management company | The Lancasters Management Ltd |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 75 flats · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
converted into 75 apartments and two leasehold houses
- freeholder
The Applicant, in this case is a residents owned company limited by guarantee and is the freeholder.
- outcome
The tribunal therefore grants dispensation under section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 from the consultation requirements of section 20.
- s20
The tribunal therefore grants dispensation under section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 from the consultation requirements of section 20.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.