Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near NW8 0ET

74 Carlton Hill, London, NW8 0ET

LON/00BK/LDC/2021/0242 · dispensation from consultation · Westminster · decided 23 Nov 2021

The tribunal granted retrospective dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent roof repairs at 74 Carlton Hill, limited to the £3714.00 invoice from D.P.Buzzing & Co, while stating that payability of the charges is not decided.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationDispensation granted
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordnot a company, or not stated
Management companynone named
Managing agentWarwick Estates
BuildingA block, 5 flats
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputerepairs and maintenance
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
the property was subsequently converted into 5 flats over four floors
agent
Representative : Warwick Estates
outcome
The Tribunal grants retrospective dispensation under section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
s20
The Tribunal grants retrospective dispensation under section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (‘the 1985 Act’) for works undertaken to repair a leaking roof

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.