74 Auckland Road, London, SE19 2DH
LON/00AH/LAM/2021/0025 · appointment of a manager · Croydon · decided 20 Apr 2022
figures not yet checkedNo plain-English summary for this decision yet. See the original.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | 74 Auckland Road Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Prime Property Management |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | insurance, major works, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund, utilities, legal and professional fees, administration charges |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Respondent : 74 Auckland Road Limited
- agent
[name] of Prime Property Management (‘the Manager’) is appointed as manager
- outcome
In accordance with section 24(1) Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 [name] of Prime Property Management (‘the Manager’) is appointed as manager
- s20c
An order shall be made under section 20C Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 that the Respondent’s costs before the Tribunal shall not be added to the service charges.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.