73 Norbury Crescent, London, SW16 4JT
LON/00AH/LDC/2023/0290 · dispensation from consultation · Croydon · decided 13 Mar 2024
The tribunal granted retrospective dispensation from the s.20 consultation requirements for emergency roof replacement over a bay window and lead flashing works carried out in June 2022, as the leaseholders were not prejudiced; it did not decide whether the costs are reasonable or payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Foxglade Properties Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 4 flats · 3 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
converted block of 4 self-contained residential flats
- freeholder
Applicant : Foxglade Properties Limited
- outcome
The tribunal dispenses with the statutory consultation requirements in respect of the works set out in the application notice
- s20
The tribunal dispenses with compliance with the consultation requirement in respect of the works set out in the application.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.