73 Chatsworth Road, London E5 0LH
LON/00AM/LDC/2024/0288 · dispensation from consultation · Hackney · decided 26 Nov 2024
The Tribunal granted retrospective dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for emergency repairs to the upper exterior of the building, on condition that the landlord bears its own costs and pays the leaseholder's reasonable costs of resisting, if any.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the applicant to bear its own costs of the application and pay the respondent's reasonable costs of resisting it, if any |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- outcome
The Tribunal grants the application for retrospective dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements
- s20
The Tribunal grants the application for retrospective dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements
- costs
pays the Respondent’s reasonable costs of resisting the application for dispensation, if any
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.