72 Schubert Road, Putney, London SW15 2QS
LON/00BJ/LDC/2021/0098 · dispensation from consultation · Wandsworth · decided 20 Jul 2021
The tribunal granted retrospective dispensation from the s.20 consultation requirements for urgent repairs to a leaking flat roof, on condition the landlord bears its own application costs.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 3 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2019 |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the applicant to bear its own costs of this application, not to be passed on to leaseholders |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
converted into 3 flats in 1989
- years
The leak was reported on 21st June 2019
- outcome
The Tribunal grants the applicant retrospective dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements
- s20
The Tribunal grants the applicant retrospective dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements
- costs
Dispensation is granted on the condition that the applicant is to bear its own costs of this application
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.