72-86 Sycamore Road, Amersham, Buckinghamshire HP6 5DR
CAM/11UC/LDC/2019/0007 · dispensation from consultation · Buckinghamshire · decided 18 Apr 2019
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the further statutory consultation requirements for urgent works to install edge protection, emergency lighting and new skylights at 72-86 Sycamore Road, Amersham.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Castlebrook Holdings Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Knight Frank LLP |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- agent
Representative : Knight Frank LLP
- outcome
The Applicant is granted dispensation from further consultation requirements for work to install edge protection to the rear roof, install emergency lighting and to install new skylights in each flat.
- s20
The Applicant is granted dispensation from further consultation requirements for work to install edge protection to the rear roof, install emergency lighting and to install new skylights in each flat.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.