71 Vanguard Chase, New Costessey, Norwich, Norfolk NR5 0UG
CAM/33UG/LSC/2020/0048 · service charges · South Norfolk · decided 1 Feb 2021
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found the sinking fund contributions for external decoration unreasonable and reduced the leaseholder's share of the 2019 painting works to £268.75, prevented the landlord adding litigation costs to the service charge, and ordered the landlord to refund half the application costs.
| Outcome | Not stated |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Adriatic Land 3 Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance, reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | legal and professional fees, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to reimburse the applicant half of the sums expended in issuing the application |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Respondent : [name] 3 Limited
- agent
Represented by Watson Property Group (“managing agents”)
- items reduced
I am not satisfied that the contribution made by the Applicant to the sinking fund in respect of external decoration, was reasonable.
- s20c
the Respondent shall be prohibited from adding to the service charge accounts any costs incurred in responding to these proceedings
- costs
the Respondent shall reimburse to the Applicant half of the sums expended by him in issuing this application.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.