71 Hazel Grove, Cowersley Lane, Huddersfield, HD7 5TQ
MAN/00CZ/LSC/2025/0601 · service charges · Kirklees · decided 15 May 2026
figures not yet checkedThe Tribunal found the 2014 charge of £300 not payable because no certificate was served, the 2020 footpath repair charge of £333 not payable, and the 2022 charge of £239.40 repaid, made no determination on the withdrawn 2019 item, and made an order preventing the landlord from recovering its costs of the proceedings through the service charge.
| Outcome | Withdrawn |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Linthwaite (Freehold) Management Company Limited |
| Management company | Linthwaite (Freehold) Management Company Limited |
| Managing agent | Regent Management Limited |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2014, 2019, 2020, 2022 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, cleaning and grounds, other, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | other, repairs and maintenance |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Respondent : [name] (Freehold) Management
- agent
Respondent’s : Regent Management Limited
- years
the service charge years 2014, 2019, 2020, and 2022 are payable
- items reduced
b. For the service charge year 2020 in the sum of £333 in respect of part of the cost of the repair works to the common footpath is not payable.
- s20c
(3) The Tribunal makes an order under s 20C Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 and para 5A sch 11 Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.