7 Versailles Road, Anerley, London, SE20 8AX
LON/00AF/LDC/2025/0944 · dispensation from consultation · Bromley · decided 5 Feb 2026
The tribunal granted unconditional dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for the urgent replacement of a leaking communal soil pipe at the building, which cost £2,000.00.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Consultation failure found |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Southern Land Securities Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Together Property Management Limited |
| Building | A block, 4 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
which has been converted into 4 flats.
- freeholder
The Landlord is Southern Land Securities Limited.
- agent
The Applicant, Together Property Management Limited, is the managing agent appointed by the Landlord.
- outcome
The Tribunal grants unconditional dispensation pursuant to s.20ZA in respect of the Works required at the Premises
- s20
We note too, that this is against the background of non-compliance with the consultation requirements.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.