7 Soper Mews, Harston Drive, EN3 6GQ
LON/00AK/LAC/2022/0005 · administration charges · Enfield · decided 28 Oct 2022
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found that no administration charges were payable by the leaseholder, as the demands lacked the statutory information required, and made orders preventing the landlord's litigation costs being charged to her and requiring the management company to repay her £200 tribunal fee.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Fairfield Rents Limited |
| Management company | Enfield Island Village Phase 1 Management Limited |
| Managing agent | ICRI Ltd |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, legal and professional fees, other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | administration charges, legal and professional fees, other |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to reimburse the applicant's tribunal fees of £200 |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
The owner of the freehold interest appears to be Fairfield Rents Limited.
- management company
Following an application for permission to appeal made by [name] 1 Management Limited
- agent
EIV has appointed ICRI Ltd as managing agents.
- items reduced
No Administration Charges are payable by Ms [name]
- s20c
An order is made pursuant to s.20C Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 that none of the costs incurred, or to be incurred, in the County Court or tribunal proceedings
- costs
EIV must pay to Ms [name] the sums that she has paid to the tribunal to pursue her application, those being £200.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.