7 Lakeside Road, Poole, Dorset, BH13 6LR
CHI/00HN/LDC/2019/0060 · dispensation from consultation · Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole · decided 6 Sep 2019
The Tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent replacement of components of the underground car park ventilation system, while making no finding on whether the costs are reasonable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Fulbrook Heights Freehold Limited |
| Management company | Castleford Management Company |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 6 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
Mr and Mrs [name] (Flat 6)
- freeholder
Applicant : Fulbrook Heights Freehold Limited
- management company
Representative : Castleford Management Company
- outcome
The Tribunal, therefore, dispenses with the consultation requirements in respect of the proposed works to the ventilation system.
- s20
The Tribunal, therefore, dispenses with the consultation requirements in respect of the proposed works to the ventilation system.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.