7 Holland Villas Road, London, W14 8BP
LON/00AW/LDC/2025/0815 · dispensation from consultation · Kensington and Chelsea · decided 14 Apr 2026
The Tribunal granted the landlord unconditional dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent repairs to the high-level cornice render and a third-floor window sill, finding no prejudice to the lessees, and made no decision on whether the costs are reasonable or payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | R & H Trust Co Jersey Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Anthem Management |
| Building | A block, 5 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
There are 5 flats within the Property.
- freeholder
Applicant : R & H Trust Co Jersey Ltd (landlord)
- agent
Representative : [name], Anthem Management
- outcome
The Applicant is granted dispensation under Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- s20
The Applicant is granted dispensation under Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (“the 1985 Act”) from the statutory consultation requirements imposed on the landlord
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.