7 Epirus Mansions, Epirus Road SW6 7UJ
LON/00AN/LSC/2022/0209 · service charges · Hammersmith and Fulham · decided 5 Jan 2023
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found the £2,218 accounting correction and most of the 2022 service charge budget payable, but disallowed the £400 company secretary cost, and held it had no jurisdiction over the solicitors' invoice share and the dilapidations claim.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 3 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2021, 2022 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, cleaning and grounds, insurance, legal and professional fees, other, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | administration charges |
| Total demanded | £6,190.83 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
[name] 1 expenses were charged to all six flats.
- years
The application form lists the years 2021 and 2022 as the years for which a determination is sought.
- outcome
this is a reasonable sum for the Applicant to pay in respect of service charges save as to the item dealt with in paragraph 24 (costs of company secretary £400).
- items reduced
save as to the item dealt with in paragraph 24 (costs of company secretary £400).
- total demanded
R1 served service charge demands on the Applicant for the total sum of £6,190.83 (the Sum)
- s20c
in view of our findings no s20C order will be made or a refund ordered of the Applicant’s Tribunal fees by the Respondent.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.