7 Elmcroft Drive, Ashford, Surrey, TW15 2PQ
CHI/43UH/LSC/2023/0030 · service charges · Spelthorne · decided 18 Sep 2023
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found the 2023 major repairs charge of £3,461.51 reasonable, held that the section 20 consultation was properly carried out, and refused the requests for orders limiting the landlord's litigation costs under section 20C and paragraph 5A.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Cyntra Properties Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Wildheart Residential Management Limited |
| Building | An estate, 20 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2023 |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £3,461.51 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
It is part of a development comprising twenty units across five blocks.
- freeholder
Respondent : Cyntra Properties Limited
- agent
The property is managed by Wildheart Residential Management Limited on behalf of the respondent.
- years
the amount of service charges payable by the Applicant in respect of the 2023 service charge year.
- outcome
The tribunal therefore determines that the amounts claimed are reasonable.
- total demanded
Her share (at 5%) amounts to £3,461.51
- total payable
It therefore determines that this amount as her share of the costs of major repairs in the 2023 service charge budget is reasonable.
- s20c
The tribunal therefore dismisses the applicant’s application for it to make a Section 20C order.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.