7 Edge Hill London, SW19 4LR
LON/00BA/LDC/2025/0869 · dispensation from consultation · Merton · decided 4 Mar 2026
The tribunal granted the landlord unconditional dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent roof repair works carried out in June 2024, while making no finding on whether the costs are reasonable or payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Ian Humberstone Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 8 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2024 |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
the property is a block of 8 flats in a residential building
- freeholder
Applicant : [name] Limited
- years
invoices from [name] Services dated 27 June 2024 for £4860 and from Vani Plumbing Services dated 26 June 2024 for £500
- outcome
The application for dispensation from the consultation requirements in respect of roof repair works is GRANTED unconditionally.
- s20
the Tribunal grants dispensation unconditionally, in relation to the works referenced in the application.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.