7 Crossways Windsor Road Slough SL1 2NE
CAM/00MD/LSC/2020/0054 · service charges · Slough · decided 22 Mar 2021
The tribunal found the window cleaning, electricity and management charges for 2020 and 2021 reasonable and payable, reduced the internal cleaning charges by 25% for both years, refused compensation, ordered the respondent to refund the £100 application fee, and made a 75% section 20C order.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Remus Management Limited |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2020 |
| Items in dispute | cleaning and grounds, management fees, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | cleaning and grounds |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | respondent to reimburse the applicant's application fee £100 |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- agent
instructed Remus Management Limited (Remus) as the managing agent
- years
Year ended 2020
- outcome
the charge to the applicant is reduced by 25%
- items reduced
the charge to the applicant is reduced by 25%
- s20c
An order be made under section 20c of the Landlord and Tenant Act
- costs
the Respondent refund the Applicant’s application fee payment of £100
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.