7 Cannon House,Beaufoy Walk,London,SE11 6HU
LON/00AY/LDC/2025/0606 · dispensation from consultation · Lambeth · decided 28 May 2025
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for a long-term gas supply agreement with ESPO covering 1 April 2023 to 31 March 2027, finding the savings justified it and no prejudice to leaseholders.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Watmos Community Housing Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 78 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2023 |
| Items in dispute | utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The properties comprise 78 leasehold flats in a variety of purpose built blocks
- freeholder
Applicant : Watmos Community Housing Ltd
- years
for the period from 1 April 2023 to 31 March 2027
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that the statutory consultation requirements shall be dispensed with in respect of a qualifying long term agreement
- s20
The Tribunal determines that the statutory consultation requirements shall be dispensed with in respect of a qualifying long term agreement
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.