7 Buckland Crescent, London NW3 5DH
LON/00AG/LRM/2022/0036 · right to manage · Camden · decided 30 Nov 2022
The tribunal decided that the RTM company was entitled to acquire the right to manage 7 Buckland Crescent, because the resident landlord exemption did not apply where the freeholder is a company whose directors or shareholders live in the building.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Derimay Property Management Limited |
| Management company | 7 Buckland Crescent RTM Company Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 4 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | not stated |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Derimay Property Management Limited
- management company
7 Buckland Crescent RTM Company Limited
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that, on the date on which the notice of claim was given, the Applicant was entitled to acquire the Right to Manage 7 Buckland Crescent, London NW3 5DH.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.