7 Brendon, Tamworth, B77 4JW
BIR/41UK/LAC/2020/0003 · administration charges · Tamworth · decided 19 Jan 2021
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found the leaseholder under no liability to pay the administration charges claimed, and in an addendum ordered that the landlord's litigation costs cannot be added to the service charge and any litigation-cost administration charge is extinguished.
| Outcome | Not payable |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Wallace Partnership Reversionary Group Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | administration charges |
| Items disallowed or reduced | administration charges |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Respondent : Wallace Partnership Reversionary Group Ltd
- outcome
The Applicant is under no liability to pay any Administration Charges to the
- items reduced
The Applicant is under no liability to pay any Administration Charges to the
- s20c
Pursuant to section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 I order that all costs
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.