7-11 White Lion Gate, Cobham, Surrey, KT11 1AQ
CHI/43UB/LDC/2024/0036 · dispensation from consultation · Elmbridge · decided 26 Feb 2024
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for replacing a PCB board to return the lift at 7-11 White Lion Gate to working order, without deciding whether any costs are reasonable or payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | White Lion Gate Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | HES Estate Management Ltd |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
five self-contained apartmnts on the ground, first and second floors
- freeholder
Applicant : White Lion Gate Limited
- agent
Representative : HES Estate Management Ltd
- outcome
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of S.20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- s20
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of S.20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in respect of replacing the PCB board to return the lift to working order.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.