68b Cadogan Terrace, Hackney Wick, London, E9 5EQ
LON/00AM/LSC/2019/0236 · service charges · Hackney · decided 16 Dec 2019
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found the roof and window replacement charges payable and reasonable, limited the landlord's recoverable application costs to 50% through the service charge, and ordered the application fee to be refunded while the hearing fee was not.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 24 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2019 |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to reimburse the applicant's application fee; hearing fee not refunded |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
24 flats in a four storey block
- years
for the 2019/20 service charge year
- outcome
are payable and reasonable.
- costs
should be refunded the application fee but should not be refunded the hearing fee.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.