67A Glengarry Road, East Dulwich, London, SE22 8QA

LON/00BE/LSC/2021/0357 · service charges · Southwark · decided 24 Mar 2022

figures not yet checked

The tribunal found most of the 2017 major works service charges payable, reducing the claim by £197.50 for two items not completed, and made no award of interest or on the counterclaim, while ordering the respondent to pay the £455 issue fee.

Outcome	Reduced
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)	Not applied for
Section 20 consultation	Not in issue
Who applied	Landlord or management company
Freeholder / landlord	not a company, or not stated
Management company	none named
Managing agent	none named
Building	One flat, 2 flats
Service charge years in dispute	2017
Items in dispute	major works
Items disallowed or reduced	major works
Total demanded	£4,142.67
Total found payable	£3,945.17
Fees or costs ordered	the respondent to pay the applicant £455 county court issue fee

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n: It is one of two flats in a brick built terraced property.
years: service charge year 2017 that were itemised major works.
outcome: the total deductions were £197.50
items reduced: the total deductions were £197.50
total demanded: being a net claim of £4142.67
total payable: (i) Service charges: £3945.17
costs: there should be an award of the sum of £455 payable by the respondent to the applicant

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.