67 Clarendon Road, Leeds, LS2 9DR
MAN/00DA/LDC/2021/0003 · dispensation from consultation · Leeds · decided 20 Apr 2021
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent roof repairs requiring scaffolding at the block, while stating that this does not mean the resulting service charge is reasonable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Montague Weston Investment Plc |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Inspired Property Management Limited |
| Building | A block, 9 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
converted into 9 apartments
- freeholder
The Applicant is the Freeholder and Successor to the Lessor of the leases of the apartments at the Property.
- agent
Representative : Inspired Property Management Limited
- outcome
Montague Weston Investment Plc applies to the Tribunal under Section 20ZA of Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (the Act) for dispensation from the consultation requirements
- s20
I conclude it reasonable in accordance with Section 20ZA(1) of the Act to dispense with the consultation requirements
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.