667 - 673 London Road, Westcliff on Sea, Essex, SS0 9PD
CAM/00KF/LIS/2024/0001 · LIS · Southend-on-Sea · decided 24 Feb 2025
The tribunal found that no sum is payable by the leaseholders for block insurance premiums for 2023 and on-account demands for 2024 because no proper demand was made under the lease, and ordered the respondents to refund the application fees.
| Outcome | Not payable |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | One Diamond Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2023, 2024 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, insurance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | administration charges, insurance |
| Total demanded | £7,228.60 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondents to reimburse the applicants' tribunal fees of £330.00 |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- years
the service charge year ending 31 December 2023 and ii) the service charge demands made “on-account” for the service charge year ending 31 December 2024
- outcome
The tribunal determines that no sum is payable by the Applicants to the second Respondent in respect of the service charges demanded for the block insurance premiums
- items reduced
the insurance premium has been reasonably incurred or is reasonable in amount
- s20c
Ms [name] confirmed that the Underlease does not permit the second Respondent to recover such costs from the Applicants through the service charge. Accordingly, an order under section 20C is not required
- costs
the Respondents shall pay the Applicants £330.00 within 28 days of this Decision by way of reimbursement of the tribunal fees paid by the Applicants
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.