Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near BN3 1FR

66 Lansdowne Street, Hove BN3 1FR

CHI/00ML/LDC/2021/0100 · dispensation from consultation · Brighton and Hove · decided 16 Dec 2021

The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the s.20 consultation requirements for water ingress repairs to the tiled roof over the ground floor flat, subject to conditions including an independent surveyor's report, tenders from three contractors and one nominated by a lessee.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationDispensation granted
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordCastle Lane Securities Limited
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingA block, 4 flats
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputerepairs and maintenance
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
damage to two of the four flats in the building
outcome
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of S.20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
s20
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of S.20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in respect of water ingress prevention to the tiled roof over the ground floor flat.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.