65 Selhurst Road, London, SE25 5QB
LON/00AH/LSC/2024/0029 · service charges · Croydon · decided 12 Apr 2024
The tribunal found the estimated major works costs of £66,693.75 reasonable and payable by the leaseholders in equal one-third shares by way of estimated service charge, with the landlord free to challenge actual costs later.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Avon Ground Rents Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 3 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £66,693.75 |
| Total found payable | £66,693.75 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
converted into 3 flats
- freeholder
Applicant : Avon Ground Rents Limited
- outcome
The estimated costs of £66,693.75 for the major works referred to below represent a reasonable estimate of those costs and are therefore payable by the Respondents (one-third each)
- total demanded
The total estimate is £66,693.75 inclusive of VAT, surveyor’s fees and management charges.
- total payable
the estimated costs of £66,693.75 for these proposed major works represent a reasonable estimate of those costs and are payable by the Respondents
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.