65 Greta Gardens, Crow Park Road, Keswick, Cumbria, CA12 5EL
MAN/16UD/LSC/2021/0019 · service charges · Cumberland · decided 10 Nov 2022
The Tribunal found the 2021/22 service charge of £4,233.32 reasonable and payable by the leaseholder, and held that the sinking fund contribution is not part of the service charge.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Castles & Coasts Housing Association Ltd. |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 9 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2021 |
| Items in dispute | management fees, other, reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £4,233.32 |
| Total found payable | £4,233.32 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Premises is one of sixty nine flats in a four-storey
- freeholder
The Respondent, Castles & Coasts Housing Association Ltd., has held the freehold since 31 March 2017
- years
for the 2021/22 service charge year.
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that a service charge of £4,233.32 is reasonable for the year 2021/22
- total demanded
The amount claimed from the Applicant for 2021/22 is £4,233.32.
- total payable
The Tribunal determines that the on account budget service charge of £4,233.32 for 2021/22 is reasonable and is payable by the Applicant.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.